things that are tasteless and wrong
Feb. 6th, 2002 11:11 amI was reading this article about CBS's plans to air a documentary about the World Trade Center attacks in March on the six-month anniversary. According to the article, they have some never-before-aired footage from inside the towers with the rescue workers rushing in and everyone else rushing out, after the planes hit.
I'm really, really bothered by this. I think what really gets me is a) the part in the article where it says that it's not known whether this stuff includes footage of people who didn't make it out -- whose families might be further traumatized by seeing images of their last moments; and b) the way that the CBS execs are quoted as trying to justify and excuse their decision to air the footage, swearing up and down that they're going to be respectful and not exploitative, and c) all the talk about how the filmmakers negotiated an exclusive deal with CBS.
I mean, dude, saying it doesn't make it so. Remember when you were a kid and some other kid hit you, and an adult said "Say you're sorry," and the other kid would mumble, "sorry," but you knew they didn't mean it, so it didn't make you feel any better? It's the same here. Saying that you're respectful and not exploitative does not make it so. The fact remains that you're doing it for ratings, which means you're doing it for the money, which means that it is exploitative no matter how carefully you craft your P.R. efforts.
Consider this quote from the above article:
Not difficult to watch? By whose standards? Who are you to judge what I will find difficult to watch? What the HELL would possess you to make such a huge blanket statement about this kind of event?
Oh. And the other thing that bugs me: the part where it says that the filmmakers "hope that part of the broadcast will be used to raise money for families..." Hope?? Dude, you negotiated the deal to sell CBS the rights to this footage. You could have insisted that they use it to raise money to help. But noooo, that would have jeopardized your chance at squeezing more cash out of them for yourselves, would it? And we can't have THAT. Sure, we care about raising money for victims, but only AFTER we've taken care of our own needs.
Man, this whole thing just bothers me more than I can really express. If an event as huge and horrific as Sept. 11th isn't immune to media exploitation, what is? Anything?
I'm really, really bothered by this. I think what really gets me is a) the part in the article where it says that it's not known whether this stuff includes footage of people who didn't make it out -- whose families might be further traumatized by seeing images of their last moments; and b) the way that the CBS execs are quoted as trying to justify and excuse their decision to air the footage, swearing up and down that they're going to be respectful and not exploitative, and c) all the talk about how the filmmakers negotiated an exclusive deal with CBS.
I mean, dude, saying it doesn't make it so. Remember when you were a kid and some other kid hit you, and an adult said "Say you're sorry," and the other kid would mumble, "sorry," but you knew they didn't mean it, so it didn't make you feel any better? It's the same here. Saying that you're respectful and not exploitative does not make it so. The fact remains that you're doing it for ratings, which means you're doing it for the money, which means that it is exploitative no matter how carefully you craft your P.R. efforts.
Consider this quote from the above article:
The video is dramatic but not gruesome, said Susan Zirinsky, the executive producer of the CBS broadcast. "It is remarkable to be in the belly of the beast but it is not difficult to watch," she said.
Not difficult to watch? By whose standards? Who are you to judge what I will find difficult to watch? What the HELL would possess you to make such a huge blanket statement about this kind of event?
Oh. And the other thing that bugs me: the part where it says that the filmmakers "hope that part of the broadcast will be used to raise money for families..." Hope?? Dude, you negotiated the deal to sell CBS the rights to this footage. You could have insisted that they use it to raise money to help. But noooo, that would have jeopardized your chance at squeezing more cash out of them for yourselves, would it? And we can't have THAT. Sure, we care about raising money for victims, but only AFTER we've taken care of our own needs.
Man, this whole thing just bothers me more than I can really express. If an event as huge and horrific as Sept. 11th isn't immune to media exploitation, what is? Anything?