cellphone woes
May. 30th, 2007 09:51 pmI mentioned in an earlier f-locked post that I've been having cellphone issues. Recently, every time I call someone on my cell, they say that the connection is so static-y they can barely hear me...even though from my end it sounds perfectly clear and I can hear them just fine. Needless to say, this is annoying. I'm pretty sure that it's my phone, not the network, because it happens regardless of where I am or what kind of background noise there is etc.
Anyway, my phone is quite old and has taken a lot of abuse (run through the washer one time...had chocolate melted onto it...etc.) so it's not difficult to justify getting a new one.
I'm irked, however, by the discovery that cellphone companies charge an arm and a leg for a new phone unless you sign a new 2-year contract. I'm currently off contract with T-Mobile and have been with them for many years. The sales guy says that if I sign a new contract, I get the same deal that a brand-new customer would get, i.e., a free phone. He says this in a tone like I should be grateful that T-Mobile is so nice to me! Whereas I actually think they should treat me *better* than a new customer, for being loyal. I mean, what's to stop me from switching providers?
I understand that this is the way they do business. From their perspective a new customer is actually more valuable because they can upsell and all that. It just annoys me though. I feel like brand loyalty is being denigrated or whatever.
In any case, I'm not actually going to switch providers, because I have a super-cheapo plan with T-Mobile that is only $20/month and I'm grandfathered in; they don't offer that plan any more. As far as I can tell, no one offers a plan for less than $30/month any more. It's true that my plan comes with a laughably small number of minutes, but I rarely use extra minutes, and even when I do, my bill is basically never as high as $30, even with the extra cost of extra minutes.
So I guess I might as well sign a new contract, if it'll keep me my rate and get me a nice new phone. The odds of my switching providers before the contract is up are minimal, so why not? I may, however, go with a one-year contract rather than a two-year. That way you still get the phone for cheaper than if you weren't signing a contract at all, albeit more expensive than if you were signing a contract.
So it looks like I'll be getting a new cellphone. I'm probably going to go with the Samsung, since that's what my current phone is and I really like it. whee!
I get this strange mixture of new-toy covetousness and change-averse anxiety. Oo! A new phone, shiny! Yet at the same time, what if I don't like its buttons? or its this or its that? And so forth. Also, I shall be sad to give up the Imperial Death March (aka Darth Vader's theme) as my ring tone. My old phone is so old, it can't even download ringtones; but it allows you to program in your own ringtone by hand, so I programmed in the IDM, note by painstaking note. Hey, whoever said that B.A. in music theory wouldn't come in handy? LOL!!
Anyway, my phone is quite old and has taken a lot of abuse (run through the washer one time...had chocolate melted onto it...etc.) so it's not difficult to justify getting a new one.
I'm irked, however, by the discovery that cellphone companies charge an arm and a leg for a new phone unless you sign a new 2-year contract. I'm currently off contract with T-Mobile and have been with them for many years. The sales guy says that if I sign a new contract, I get the same deal that a brand-new customer would get, i.e., a free phone. He says this in a tone like I should be grateful that T-Mobile is so nice to me! Whereas I actually think they should treat me *better* than a new customer, for being loyal. I mean, what's to stop me from switching providers?
I understand that this is the way they do business. From their perspective a new customer is actually more valuable because they can upsell and all that. It just annoys me though. I feel like brand loyalty is being denigrated or whatever.
In any case, I'm not actually going to switch providers, because I have a super-cheapo plan with T-Mobile that is only $20/month and I'm grandfathered in; they don't offer that plan any more. As far as I can tell, no one offers a plan for less than $30/month any more. It's true that my plan comes with a laughably small number of minutes, but I rarely use extra minutes, and even when I do, my bill is basically never as high as $30, even with the extra cost of extra minutes.
So I guess I might as well sign a new contract, if it'll keep me my rate and get me a nice new phone. The odds of my switching providers before the contract is up are minimal, so why not? I may, however, go with a one-year contract rather than a two-year. That way you still get the phone for cheaper than if you weren't signing a contract at all, albeit more expensive than if you were signing a contract.
So it looks like I'll be getting a new cellphone. I'm probably going to go with the Samsung, since that's what my current phone is and I really like it. whee!
I get this strange mixture of new-toy covetousness and change-averse anxiety. Oo! A new phone, shiny! Yet at the same time, what if I don't like its buttons? or its this or its that? And so forth. Also, I shall be sad to give up the Imperial Death March (aka Darth Vader's theme) as my ring tone. My old phone is so old, it can't even download ringtones; but it allows you to program in your own ringtone by hand, so I programmed in the IDM, note by painstaking note. Hey, whoever said that B.A. in music theory wouldn't come in handy? LOL!!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:03 pm (UTC)The more I think about it, the more it makes sense to just sign the contract. I mean, the odds of me deciding to change providers in the next two years are SO small.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:55 pm (UTC)